David Richards

  • Norfolk, VA
Account Management Employee
PUBLIC PROFILE

Newspapers should follow the dollars

Posted by David Richards on May 28, 2009 1:20 PM EDT
David Richards photo

Business-customers: low penetration and high direct revenue

Newspaper publishers have always had to carefully balance the interest of two customer segments, readers and advertisers. The hometown Daily Bugle needs significant numbers of each for their business model to work. Both are "antes", if you will, if you want to be in the game.  While some might argue they're of equal importance, they have not historically been treated as such. IMHO Publishers most commonly put readers "first amongst equals".  And for some pretty good reasons; there is that community watchdog role and 1'st Amendment thing, and without eyeballs there's little to sell to advertisers. Having myself overseen an ad deparment way back when, I realized the goose that laid the golden egg was in the care of the Executive Editor; if his team failed, so did I. And while I thought most Executive Editors had no appreciation for business realities -- as I've gotten older, I think I was right -- as long as they delivered the content that drove circulation, that created ad availability, it didn't really matter what I thought.  My advertisers might be second-class-customer-citizens, but the model worked.

The Reality That Arose:

One of the interesting economic and business realities that arose is captured in the following simple table:

 A.  AdvertisersB.  Readers
NP's Penetration      
10% of local businesses     
40% of local HH   
NP's Revenue        
80% of direct revenue    
20% of direct revenue    

What's interesting about this?  Well, if you didn't know anything about the industry that these numbers describe, and if you're looking at the figures with an eye toward creating new growth opportunities, most strategists would point to customer category A (Advertisers) as the better place to look for innovation.  Why?  Advertisers account for 80% of the direct revenue, yet there's only 10% penetration of the local market.  Conversely, newspapers penetrate 40% or so of local households yet they account for only 20% of direct revenue. 

But we know these figures refer to newspapers.  In my opinion, the advertiser-first growth focus is the right lens to conceive of innovation.  It is not, however, what I see the strategy development teams within the industry focusing on.  They are still consumer-first, advertiser-second. Their fundamental position is that newspapers need more AND better targeted eyeballs.  With these they can sell more and better targeted advertising (witness the Yahoo partnership). This approach can gain incrementally.  However, this will not bring about dramatic growth if only because the consumer-first strategy goes head to head with struggling little firms like Google.  Ugh.

The easier route to growth, revenue and innovation I believe is on the advertiser side of the equation.  First, however we need to drop the term "advertiser".  Instead, we need to simply consider them local businesses in need of help.  Advertising is a piece of their needs.  More broadly it's about helping them "acquire, retain and service" their customers. If we look at the world from that lens, there are an almost unlimited number of new products and services we can offer them.  More on that in another blog.

There is 1 comment

Comments

 

This is an interesting post, David, in that it begins to penetrate the true meaning and inner workings of the local community, how the traditional newspaper has historically participated, and how that must change in the very near future if the local community dynamic is to survive the onslaught of Yahoo, Google, Yelp and others.

Over the last ten years or so, newspapers have become less and less about "local", and more and more about "national" or "international" in response to the rising costs of maintaining local editorial staffs, and the loss of advertising revenue. It would seem to me that newspapers need to reassess what it means for them to be an integral part of the local community, and adjust their products and business model to suit that new role.

Technology will surely play a big part, as the printing press is clearly less and less a state of the art vehicle for information dissemination.

As an example of a tiny little newspaper trying new things, take a look at Big Pine Key, a rag that has gone digital down at the end of nowhere in southern Florida. With almost no technology at all, they have tried to position themselves in the center of online interaction within their sphere of influence. The result is quaint, but in my opinion, moving in the right direction. In a larger community and with more appropriate technology, I think there are exciting possibilities for larger newspapers.

Check out Big Pine Key at:

http://www.bigpinekey.com/Pages/menu.htm

-Tom

Tom M. photo
Tom Manos

1 decade ago

Sign in to add your comment.

Recent Posts

Recent Video
Zombies from FlexSim  
read more
How might Welch redefine the newspaper business?
Jack Welch used market definition to drive growth
read more
Newspapers should follow the dollars
Business-customers: low penetration and high direct revenue
read more
Reflections of Paris
Quite a city
read more
American Standing in the World
Part of a great series at The Miller Center
read more
My Purple Cow Avatar
It has nothing to do with Microsoft... or does it?
read more
Lincoln's 200'th
Lincoln's 200'th Birthday
read more

Go to blog